No one confuses the life of a world-class kayaker or an Olympic
fencer with that of a basketball star. When NBA player Latrell
Sprewell complained about his $14.6-million (U.S.) contract last
month, saying "I've got a family to feed," there were no outpourings
of support from the headquarters of the national badminton team.
Still, even in sports that penetrate the public consciousness
only once every four years, the life of a world-class athlete has
its attractions: travel for competitions and training camps, an
active lifestyle far removed from desks and cubicles, and the chance
to measure up against the very best in the world.
So when I finished university in 2001 and decided to train
full-time as a distance runner in pursuit of an Olympic berth, I
felt as if I were living out a lifelong dream. Sure, I had to move
back in with my parents at the age of 25, since the money I could
earn from racing barely paid for training expenses. Of course, while
I was relaxing in the middle of the day between training sessions,
my friends were all at work -- and while my friends were going out
in the evenings, I was in bed resting for the next day of
training.
I didn't mind, because I couldn't afford to go out with them
anyway. My friends called me the "quasi-professional" athlete
because, although I was working full-time as a distance runner, I
was missing one key ingredient of professionalism: money.
Funding for amateur sports is an issue that stirs up controversy
once every four years, as part of the collective brow-beating that
follows the valiant but inevitably disappointing performances of
Canadian athletes at the Olympics. Despite recent changes to funding
levels for amateur sports, the gold that athletes are shooting for
is still largely figurative.
Initially, the financial hardships I endured were outweighed by
the fact that I was fulfilling a childhood fantasy. When an
eight-year-old boy dreams of being a professional athlete, he
imagines the crowd roaring as he hits a home run or hoists the
Stanley Cup over his head, not the mercenary pleasure of inking a
multi-year contract with bonus clauses.
To my surprise, though, no one seemed jealous of my life.
Although some people were excited at first when they heard I was a
"full-time" athlete, the conversation always seemed to get stuck in
one place.
"You're living with your parents?" they would ask -- and
enthusiasm would be replaced by a look of puzzlement, and
occasionally disdain.
Even my peers in the running world seemed to be less than
thrilled by the enticements of full-time training. One year after
the 2000 Olympics, many of the people I had competed against through
high school and university were retiring. Although distance runners
usually reach their peak in their late 20s, these athletes were
unwilling to commit to another four years of quasi-professionalism.
They wanted careers and apartments and clothes.
Meanwhile, my season was unfolding successfully. I spent a month
at a national-team training camp in the French Alps and qualified to
compete at the World Cross-Country Championships in Belgium. I was
ecstatic when I received my first national team uniform. The team
veterans were less impressed: "The same stuff as last year," they
said. "This warm-up suit isn't waterproof. Why do we only get three
pairs of socks?"
Some of these athletes had closets full of national team gear.
They were the ones who had resisted the lure of money and careers to
chase Olympic glory. Some had competed at the Sydney Games in 2000;
a few were veterans of Atlanta in 1996. But none had the serene and
contented air that I would have expected from someone whose dreams
had more or less come true.
As 2004 draws to a close, another generation of athletes is
making decisions about the next four years. Those who competed at
the Athens Olympics graced our television screens for a few brief
weeks, and some are still on the tail-end of cross-country tours
speaking at schools and community events.
But the Athens afterglow has almost faded away, and the country's
top breaststrokers and pole-vaulters will be in the dark again for
the next four years. With no hoopla to sustain them, they will have
to decide whether the intrinsic pleasures of their athletic
endeavours are enough to justify the necessary sacrifices.
For me, the novelties of quasi-professionalism gradually wore
off. Seeing fellow athletes who had retired struggling in the job
market, often competing with new college graduates for unpaid
internships, I began to worry about my future. The romanticism of
living in a garret -- especially one in my parents' house -- began
to pall.
The end came 12 months after my trip to Belgium, when, having
competed across North America and as far away as China, I went to
Ireland for the next World Championships. When I received my
uniform, I was unable to contain my disappointment.
"The same stuff as last year," I said.
Alex Hutchinson is studying journalism in New York.